RE FOR THE WAR TO SAVE THE AMERICAN ECONOMY?
Posted on Monday, March 14 @ 17:10:00 CDT by David
SOURCE: WASHINGTONBLOG.COM
's former analyst at Goldman Sachs, Charles Nenner, joins the predictions of a great war of Marc Faber and Gerald Celente
In 2009 I wrote that:
To say that 'America would start to help in various wars' s economy is outrageous, right?
course.
Yet the 'leading economist Marc Faber has said repeatedly that the U.S. government will start new wars in response to the economic crisis:
- The next thing the government will do for distract 'attention from the bad conditions of the population' s economy will start a war somewhere. "
-" If the 'global economy does not recover, usually you go to war. "-"
Faber is crazy ?
Perhaps, but one of the best futurists (trend forecaster), Gerald Celente, 's agreement.
so on Antiwar Justin Raimondo writes:
As Gerald Celente said the other day, one of the few economic forecasters predicted that the crisis of 2008, "encouraged by their governments seem to be failures." What, finally, General William E. Odom has described as "the worst strategic disaster in American military history "- 's invasion of Iraq' - is to be followed by an even larger military operation, which will weigh on us for many years. This certainly seems to evidence supporting the thesis of Celente. Celente predicted the market crash of '87, the fall of the 'Soviet Union, the bursting of the dot-com, the bull market of' gold, the 2001 recession, the housing bubble, the panic of 2008, is now talking about an 'inevitable outbreak "bubble rescue", and more bad news:
"Given the way that governments have to make significant failures in mega-bankruptcies, when all else fails, the classic trend following is to bring their country war "
While the economic crisis increases and the system of central banks based on debt shows that it can not inflate the financial bubble created asset from scratch, it's easy to find a political and economic justification for the war, because if it is true Keynesian doctrine where public spending is the 'only way to emerge from an economic depression, then military spending is certainly the fastest way to inject "life" in a system that holds water. Economically, it does not work, since the crisis is only masked by the atmosphere of war and deprivation-emergency "temporary." Politically, however, is a salvation for our ruling elite, which is tiring unloading the blame on a target "foreign."
It 's the oldest trick in the world, and we are doing it under his nose, as the U.S. prepares to send even more troops on the front Aghani and threaten the' draconian economic sanctions with Iran, we are a step or two by the war.
A looming economic depression and the terrible prospect of 'another great war - the worst scenario seems to be, like a recurring nightmare ...
Celente The forecaster has identified a number of bubbles, the 'last one is the "bailout bubble (the bubble of capital injections), which can explode at any moment, but there may be an' other bubble followed by the that Celente calls "the mother of all bubbles, which implode with a thud heard round the world - the bubble of 'empire.
Our current foreign policy of global hegemony and unbridled aggression is simply unsustainable, not when we are about to become what we call a Third World country, a bankrupt country, which faces the prospect of a radical lowering of living standards . Unless, of course, the 'atmosphere of "crisis" can be sustained almost all' infinite.
George W. Bush fell back on 'September 11th, but the chant is growing older every time you hear it. Our new president needs to find something equivalent, something that distract our attention away from Goldman Sachs, to some overseas enemy that can somehow be held responsible for our current bad situation.
It is said that it was not the New Deal of FDR to get us out of the Great Depression but the Second World War. The truth is that, in wartime, when people expect to sacrifice himself for the duration of the 'emergency' economic problems are anesthetized by liberal doses of nationalists and exalted moral rectitude. Weaknesses and plunging living standards are masked by a rationing system typical of the times of war and a lowering of expectations. And just as the Second World War we have become accustomed to economic davastazioni developed by our elite of thieves, so World War III will cover a large part of the virtual purchase of the whole 'industry by the state and the demonization of any political opponent as "terrorist."
an impossible scenario science fiction? Or a reasonable projection of current trends? Celente, whose record of predictions is impressive, to say the least, sees the war against 'as 3GM Iran with economic, social, and political will send what is left of our empire to collapse. This is the 'bubble burst' s iperpotere, we - the last remaining superpower - somehow, we have the presumption to oppose to the history and common sense, and we forget the fate of all empires decline and fall.
I certainly hope that Faber and Celente are wrong, but they are very smart guys, for decades have been right on many of their predictions. Even if their estimates were seen as highly controversial at 'era, many have proved to be accurate.
Yesterday 's former technical analyst at Goldman Sachs, Charles Nenner - very sophisticated, counts among its clients large investment funds, banks, brokerage groups and a large round of wealthy individuals - has told Fox News that there will be "a great war between 2012 and 2013, which will bring the Dow Jones to 5000.
So Nenner says
I tell my clients, pension funds, large firms, and hedge funds to go virtually out of business, leaving almost entirely from the market.
As I have repeatedly documented, influential Americans are pressing for going to war in order to save 'the U.S. economy - this is called "military Keynesianism." But as many economists have shown, the war is actually bad for the 'economy - the opposite of the commonly accepted myth.
Surely, someone else instead of the United States could give way to war.
As the bad economic policies are leading to global disturbances, it is impossible to predict where a spark to take root and become a major fire.
Source: www.washingtonsblog.com
Link: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/03/former-goldman-sachs-analyst-joins-marc.html
10.03.2011
0 comments:
Post a Comment